New York City is significantly larger than Chicago.
Size Comparison: New York City vs. Chicago
New York City is approximately 32% larger than Chicago by overall size. To put this into perspective, the borough of Brooklyn alone is roughly the same size as the entire city of Chicago.
Here's a comparison of their approximate land areas:
| City | Approximate Land Area | Relative Size (vs. Chicago) |
|---|---|---|
| New York City | 302.6 square miles | Approximately 132% |
| Chicago | 234.0 square miles | 100% |
Note: Land area figures provide a measurable aspect of a city's physical size.
Understanding the Geographical Spread
Beyond just numerical size, the geographical layout contributes to how large each city feels:
- New York City is known for being quite spread out across its five boroughs, encompassing diverse landscapes from dense urban centers to more suburban-like areas. This extensive spread contributes to its overall vastness.
- Chicago, while a major metropolis, has a greater portion of its area situated adjacent to Lake Michigan. Its shoreline stretches for approximately 23 miles, creating a distinct urban fabric heavily influenced by its lakefront. This adjacency makes a significant part of the city feel more concentrated along the water.
Ultimately, whether considering total area or the perceived expanse, New York City stands out as the larger of the two urban centers.
