Jared's immediate response to learning Justyce was accepted to Yale while he was deferred was anger, leading him to initiate a classroom discussion about affirmative action, which he claimed "discriminates against members of the majority."
Jared's Emotional State and Actions
Upon discovering Justyce's early acceptance to Yale, Jared entered the classroom visibly angry. His frustration quickly manifested into a public challenge regarding the fairness of college admissions, particularly through the lens of affirmative action.
Jared's response included:
- Expressing Anger: He was noticeably angry upon entering class.
- Initiating a Discussion on Affirmative Action: He promptly suggested that the class engage in a discussion about affirmative action.
- Claiming Discrimination: He explicitly stated his belief that affirmative action "discriminates against members of the majority."
- Highlighting His Credentials: Jared underscored his own "impressive credentials" while contrasting his deferral from Yale with Justyce's early acceptance.
The Contrast in Yale Decisions
Jared's frustration stemmed from a perceived injustice, where despite his strong academic profile, he believed his deferral was a direct consequence of policies that favored other applicants, specifically mentioning Justyce's acceptance. This comparison formed the core of his argument against affirmative action.
| Applicant | Yale Admission Outcome | Perceived Merit (by Jared) | Jared's Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jared | Deferred | "Impressive credentials" | Victim of reverse discrimination via affirmative action |
| Justyce | Early Acceptance | Beneficiary of affirmative action, at Jared's expense |
This public outburst was a direct manifestation of his resentment and belief that the system was unfair to individuals like himself.
