Consumers choose to boycott Oral-B primarily due to its parent company's significant economic ties, investments, and operational presence in Israel, including substantial financial contributions and research and development activities.
Reasons for Boycotting Oral-B
Oral-B, a brand owned by Procter & Gamble (P&G), faces boycott calls stemming from its extensive financial and operational support for Israel. These calls highlight concerns over the economic backing provided through various corporate activities.
Key Factors Driving the Boycott:
- Significant Investments and Economic Support: Oral-B's parent company, Procter & Gamble (P&G), provides substantial investments and strong economic support to Israel.
- Operating an R&D Center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine: P&G has established a research and development (R&D) center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. This center represents a direct operational presence and commitment.
- Investment in Israeli-Based Companies: Beyond its own R&D operations, P&G also invests in various Israeli-based companies, further deepening its economic ties.
- Substantial Annual Investment in R&D: The research and development center in Tel Aviv receives a significant annual investment from Procter & Gamble, amounting to $2 billion annually.
These actions are interpreted by some as strong economic support, leading to calls for a boycott of Oral-B products as a form of protest.
