zaro

What did they call restaurants back then?

Published in Food History 2 mins read

Before the term "restaurant" became widely adopted, various eating establishments were known by different names, often reflecting their regional location or the primary services they offered. These historical names highlight the diverse ways people sought meals and provisions outside their homes.

Evolution of Eating Establishments

The modern concept of a "restaurant" providing a menu of choices and individual tables for dining is a relatively recent development. Historically, places where one could get a meal were more specialized or had different functions than what we associate with restaurants today. These establishments served a crucial role in providing food and drink to travelers, workers, and locals who didn't cook at home.

Regional Names for Eating Houses

Prior to being universally referred to as "restaurants," these establishments assumed distinct regional names. The specific term used often depended on the geographic area.

Here's a breakdown of some of the names used for these eating places:

Historical Name Common Region (Example) Description
Eating House New York City A common term, especially in bustling urban centers, for places that primarily served meals.
Restorator Boston A term that hints at the "restorative" nature of food and drink, providing sustenance and recovery.
Victualling House Various areas Places that provided "victuals" (food and provisions), often serving both cooked meals and supplies.

These names illustrate the local variations in how such businesses were perceived and named. Over time, as dining evolved and standardized, the French term "restaurant" (meaning "to restore") gained international prominence, eventually becoming the universal name for such establishments.

For more information on the history and evolution of these establishments, you can explore resources on the history of restaurants.