zaro

Is CTS XHP better than S35VN?

Published in Knife Steel Comparison 3 mins read

While CTS XHP is often favored for its superior edge retention, S35VN provides a more "forgiving" experience regarding sharpening, corrosion resistance, and toughness, making the "better" choice dependent on specific user needs and preferences.

Understanding "Better" in Steel Performance

When comparing high-performance steels like CTS XHP and S35VN, the term "better" is subjective and largely depends on the intended use and user's priorities. Both are premium powdered metallurgy steels known for their excellent performance in knife blades, but they offer different advantages.

CTS XHP: The Edge Retention Champion

CTS XHP, often referred to as a "powder metallurgy D2," is a high-carbon, high-chromium stainless steel. It is frequently regarded for its ability to hold a keen edge for extended periods, making it an excellent choice for tasks requiring prolonged cutting performance.

Key characteristics of CTS XHP include:

  • Superior Edge Retention: It excels at maintaining sharpness through extensive use.
  • Harder to Sharpen: Due to its wear resistance, sharpening CTS XHP can be more challenging and time-consuming.
  • Slightly Less Stainless: While considered stainless, it is somewhat less corrosion resistant compared to S35VN.

S35VN: The Forgiving Performer

S35VN (CPM-S35VN) is an improved version of S30V, designed to offer enhanced toughness and ease of sharpening while maintaining excellent edge retention and corrosion resistance. It strikes a balance that many users find highly practical for everyday carry (EDC) knives.

Key characteristics of S35VN include:

  • Easier Sharpening: It is generally more user-friendly to sharpen than CTS XHP.
  • Excellent Corrosion Resistance: Offers robust protection against rust and environmental elements.
  • Good Strength/Toughness: It is more resistant to chipping and breaking, making it a more "forgiving" steel in demanding applications.
  • Very Good Edge Retention: While perhaps not matching XHP, its edge retention is still exceptional for most tasks.

Side-by-Side Comparison: CTS XHP vs. S35VN

To illustrate their differences, here's a direct comparison of key attributes:

Feature CTS XHP S35VN
Edge Retention Generally superior Excellent
Sharpening Ease More challenging; requires more effort Easier; more forgiving
Corrosion Resistance Good; slightly less stainless Excellent
Toughness/Strength Very good Excellent; more resistant to chipping/breaking
Overall Perception Often considered better for pure cutting performance A more balanced, "forgiving" all-rounder

Choosing the Right Steel for You

Both CTS XHP and S35VN are high-performance steels used in quality knives and tools. The choice between them ultimately depends on your primary needs and how you intend to use the blade.

Consider the following when making your decision:

  1. Prioritize Edge Retention? If your main concern is having a blade that stays sharp for the longest possible time, even if it means more effort to resharpen, CTS XHP might be your preferred choice. This is ideal for continuous cutting tasks.
  2. Value Ease of Maintenance and Durability? If you prefer a blade that is easier to sharpen, more resistant to rust, and less prone to chipping in tougher applications, S35VN offers a more balanced and "forgiving" experience. This is often favored for everyday carry or outdoor use where versatility and robustness are key.
  3. Frequency of Sharpening: If you dislike sharpening or don't have specialized sharpening equipment, S35VN's easier sharpening characteristics could be a significant advantage.
  4. Environment: For highly humid or corrosive environments, S35VN's superior rust resistance might make it the better option.

In essence, while CTS XHP can boast a slight edge in raw edge-holding capability, S35VN provides a highly practical and well-rounded performance profile, making both excellent choices for different user preferences.