zaro

Understanding Meeting Components: Matter Arising vs. Agenda Item

Published in Meeting Management 4 mins read

The difference between "matter arising" and "agenda" primarily lies in their origin, purpose, and the depth of discussion required within a meeting.

"Matters arising" typically refers to follow-up actions or updates from the previous meeting's minutes, requiring only a brief verbal report. In contrast, an "agenda item" is a new, substantive topic proposed for detailed discussion, decision-making, or strategic planning, often accompanied by supporting documentation.

Effective meeting management hinges on clear terminology and structure. Two often-confused elements are "matters arising" and "agenda items." While both contribute to a meeting's flow, they serve distinct purposes.

What is a Matter Arising?

A matter arising is an item that originates from the minutes of a previous meeting. Its primary purpose is to provide updates or ensure follow-through on decisions or action points previously agreed upon.

  • Origin: Directly from the action points or discussion outcomes documented in the minutes of a prior meeting.
  • Purpose: To report on the progress of previously assigned tasks, confirm completion of actions, or provide quick updates on ongoing issues that were discussed before.
  • Nature of Discussion: As the provided rule of thumb states, "if there is only a verbal update on the item then it is a matter arising from the minutes." This implies a brief, informational update rather than in-depth debate.
  • Examples:
    • "Update on the Q1 marketing campaign report (Action point 3 from last meeting)."
    • "Confirmation that the new software license has been procured."
    • "Brief report on the vendor meeting held as per last week's decision."

What is an Agenda Item?

An agenda item is a distinct, new topic or issue that requires discussion, decision, or input during the current meeting. These are the core subjects around which the meeting is structured.

  • Origin: A new proposal, problem, strategy, or report that needs to be addressed by the group. It is not necessarily a direct follow-up from previous minutes.
  • Purpose: To introduce new topics, make significant decisions, deliberate on important proposals, review substantial reports, or formulate new strategies.
  • Nature of Discussion: The rule of thumb clarifies, "if there is a substantial paper for discussion and decision then it is a new agenda item." This indicates that these items often involve detailed presentations, data analysis, and considerable debate.
  • Examples:
    • "Proposal for New Product Launch Strategy (Paper attached)."
    • "Review of Annual Budget Allocation for 2024."
    • "Discussion on Remote Work Policy Revisions."
    • "Strategic Planning Session for Market Expansion."

Key Differences at a Glance

To highlight the distinction, here's a comparative table:

Feature Matter Arising Agenda Item
Origin From previous meeting's minutes/action points New topic, issue, or proposal
Purpose Follow-up, update on prior actions Discussion, decision, planning on new subjects
Material Usually verbal update, brief report Often accompanied by a "substantial paper"
Discussion Typically brief, informational, progress-based Detailed, deliberative, decision-oriented
Time Allotment Shorter, quick check-ins Longer, dedicated discussion slots
Outcome Acknowledgment of progress, next steps (if any) Decisions made, strategies formulated, new actions agreed

Practical Implications for Meeting Efficiency

Understanding these differences is crucial for creating effective and efficient meetings:

  • Clearer Agendas: By differentiating, meeting organizers can create more logical and time-sensitive agendas. "Matters arising" can be grouped at the beginning for quick updates, reserving the bulk of the meeting for new "agenda items."
  • Focused Discussions: Participants know whether they are expected to provide a quick update or engage in a deep dive, leading to more focused contributions.
  • Efficient Time Management: Allocating appropriate time slots—short for matters arising, longer for agenda items—prevents meetings from running over or getting bogged down in minor updates.
  • Accountability: Matters arising directly link back to previous commitments, enhancing accountability and tracking of progress. New agenda items set new commitments.

In essence, "matters arising" looks backward to ensure previous work is on track, while "agenda items" look forward, driving new initiatives and decisions.