The missing number depends on the interpretation of the sequence. The most common interpretation leads to 32.
Understanding the Sequence
The sequence 2, 4, 8, 16 represents a geometric progression where each subsequent number is double the previous number.
- 2 x 2 = 4
- 4 x 2 = 8
- 8 x 2 = 16
Following this pattern, the next number is:
- 16 x 2 = 32
Therefore, the missing number is 32. Multiple sources confirm this, such as this Byju's answer which explicitly states that the sequence is formed by doubling each number. Similarly, this Toppr solution identifies 32 and 64 as the next two terms.
Alternative Interpretations (Less Likely)
While less probable, other interpretations could exist, depending on a more complex underlying pattern. However, without further information, the simplest and most logical answer remains 32.
