While the term "agenda setting" often refers to the initial phase where issues gain public and governmental attention, within the context of a widely applied stages model of public policy, "agenda setting" is specifically identified as the first of five core stages that characterize the entire policy process.
According to prominent scholars like Brewer and DeLeon (1983), DeLeon (1999), and Sabatier (1999: 6; 2007: 6), the policy process is fundamentally structured into five distinct stages. These stages are expressed as:
- Agenda Setting
- Formulation
- Legitimation
- Implementation
- Evaluation
This model provides a structured framework for understanding how public problems are identified, translated into policy solutions, enacted, put into practice, and ultimately assessed for their impact.
Understanding Each Stage of the Public Policy Process
Each stage plays a crucial role in the journey of a public issue from a perceived problem to an enforced and assessed solution.
Overview of the Policy Process Stages
| Stage | Key Focus | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Agenda Setting | Problem Identification & Public Attention | The process by which certain problems come to the attention of the public and policymakers, leading them to be considered for government action. This involves framing issues and mobilizing support. |
| Formulation | Developing Solutions & Policy Proposals | The creation and development of viable policy alternatives to address the problems identified during agenda setting. This stage involves research, debate, and the drafting of specific policy proposals. |
| Legitimation | Policy Adoption & Legalization | The stage where a proposed policy gains legal authority and public acceptance. This often involves legislative approval (e.g., passing bills), executive orders, or public endorsement through various formal and informal means. |
| Implementation | Putting Policies into Action | The execution of the adopted policy by government agencies, organizations, and other actors. This involves translating policy goals into concrete actions, programs, and services, often requiring administrative rules and resource allocation. |
| Evaluation | Assessing Policy Impact & Effectiveness | The systematic assessment of a policy's effectiveness, efficiency, and impact. This stage determines whether the policy achieved its intended goals, identify unintended consequences, and often informs future policy adjustments or new policy cycles. |
Detailed Exploration of the Stages
-
Agenda Setting
This foundational stage is where issues or problems emerge from the broader societal context and capture the attention of governmental bodies. It's not merely about identifying a problem but ensuring it rises above competing issues to become a priority for action.- Examples: Public outcry over rising healthcare costs, scientific reports on climate change, or specific incidents like a major natural disaster prompting a focus on disaster preparedness.
- Practical Insight: Advocacy groups, media, research institutions, and political leaders often play significant roles in framing issues and pushing them onto the policy agenda. The ability to define a problem powerfully can largely influence how it is addressed.
-
Formulation
Once an issue is on the agenda, the formulation stage involves designing potential solutions. This includes developing specific policies, programs, and legislative proposals to address the identified problem. It's a highly analytical and often contested phase.- Examples: Drafting a new environmental protection bill, designing a job training program, or developing regulations for a new technology.
- Practical Insight: Policy alternatives are often generated through collaboration between government agencies, experts, interest groups, and sometimes the public. Compromise is frequently necessary to forge a proposal that can garner sufficient support.
-
Legitimation
This stage focuses on granting legal authority and public acceptance to the formulated policy. For a policy to be implemented, it must typically pass through formal legal processes, such as legislative voting, executive approval, or regulatory adoption. Public acceptance, while not always legally required, can be crucial for smooth implementation.- Examples: Congressional approval of a budget, presidential signing of a bill into law, or a regulatory agency issuing new rules after public comment.
- Practical Insight: Strong political will and coalition-building are vital here. A policy might be technically sound but fail to legitimize if it lacks sufficient political or public backing.
-
Implementation
Implementation is the action phase, where the adopted policies are put into practice. This involves various administrative, managerial, and operational activities by government agencies, non-profits, and private entities. Resources are allocated, programs are launched, and services are delivered.- Examples: A new healthcare law leading to the establishment of health insurance marketplaces, a public safety policy resulting in increased police patrols, or an education reform requiring new curriculum development by schools.
- Practical Insight: Effective implementation requires clear guidelines, adequate funding, skilled personnel, and often coordination across multiple levels of government and organizations. Gaps in implementation can lead to policies failing to achieve their intended outcomes despite being well-designed.
-
Evaluation
The final stage involves assessing the policy's performance and impact. This includes determining whether the policy achieved its objectives, identifying unintended consequences, and analyzing its cost-effectiveness. The findings from evaluation often feed back into the agenda-setting stage, leading to policy adjustments, termination, or the creation of new policies, forming a continuous cycle.- Examples: An audit assessing the effectiveness of a job training program in placing participants in jobs, a study measuring the environmental impact of new regulations, or public surveys gauging satisfaction with a new government service.
- Practical Insight: Rigorous evaluation is critical for learning and accountability. It helps policymakers understand what works and why, enabling evidence-based decision-making and ensuring resources are used efficiently.
[[Public Policy Stages]]
