zaro

Is Landlord Insurance Cheaper Than Homeowners?

Published in Property Insurance Costs 3 mins read

No, landlord insurance is generally not cheaper than homeowners insurance. In fact, a landlord insurance policy typically costs about 25% more than a standard homeowners insurance policy for the same property.

Understanding the Cost Difference Between Landlord and Homeowners Insurance

The primary reasons for the difference in cost between landlord insurance and homeowners insurance revolve around who is occupying the home and the distinct risks associated with each scenario. While both policies protect the dwelling itself, their coverage extends differently based on whether the owner or a tenant resides in the property.

Here's a quick comparison:

Feature Homeowners Insurance Landlord Insurance (Dwelling Fire/Rental Property Insurance)
Occupant Owner-occupied Tenant-occupied
Primary Purpose Protects owner's home and personal belongings Protects rental property and landlord's financial interests
Liability Coverage Covers injuries to guests and property damage by owner Covers injuries to tenants/guests on property due to landlord's negligence
Personal Property Covers owner's personal belongings Does not cover tenant's personal belongings
Loss of Use/Rent Covers additional living expenses if home is uninhabitable Covers lost rental income if property is uninhabitable due to covered peril
Cost Generally lower Generally higher (approx. 25% more than homeowners)

Key Reasons for Higher Landlord Insurance Costs

Landlord insurance, also known as dwelling fire or rental property insurance, carries a higher premium due to several factors that increase the risk for insurers:

  • Increased Liability Risk: When you rent out a property, you assume more liability. Tenants and their guests may be injured on the property, leading to potential lawsuits. Landlord insurance provides broader liability coverage for situations not covered by a standard homeowners policy, such as injuries to a tenant due to the landlord's negligence.
  • Tenant-Related Risks: Tenants may cause more wear and tear, or even accidental damage, than an owner would. While the policy doesn't cover tenant-caused damage (unless specifically added or covered by the tenant's own renters insurance), the general risk profile increases.
  • Lack of Owner Presence: An owner living in their home can quickly identify and mitigate potential hazards (e.g., a leaky pipe, a loose railing). When a property is rented out, the owner is not always present, which can delay the discovery and repair of issues, potentially leading to more extensive damage or increased liability claims.
  • Coverage for Loss of Rent: A significant component of landlord insurance is coverage for lost rental income if the property becomes uninhabitable due to a covered peril (like a fire or storm damage). This type of coverage is not typically part of a standard homeowners policy, adding to the premium.
  • No Personal Property Coverage for Tenant's Belongings: While the policy is more expensive, it's important to note that it does not cover the tenant's personal property. Tenants are responsible for purchasing their own renters insurance to protect their belongings.

In essence, the higher cost of landlord insurance reflects the increased financial risks and broader coverage needs associated with owning and renting out a property, as opposed to simply living in it.