zaro

Can One Person Own an Entire Town?

Published in Real Estate Ownership 3 mins read

Yes, it is indeed possible for one person, or a private entity, to own an entire town. While it's not as common as buying a house or a standard piece of land, there have been various instances throughout history and in modern times where entire towns or significant portions of them have been listed for sale and subsequently acquired by private individuals or corporations.

What Does "Owning a Town" Entail?

When an individual "owns" a town, it typically means they have purchased a substantial amount, if not all, of the private land, buildings, and infrastructure within its boundaries. This can include:

  • Residential Properties: Homes, apartments, and other housing units.
  • Commercial Establishments: Shops, restaurants, hotels, and other businesses.
  • Industrial Facilities: Factories, warehouses, or other production sites.
  • Vacant Land: Undeveloped plots within the town's limits.
  • Private Infrastructure: In some cases, essential utilities such as water systems, power grids, or roads that are privately maintained.

However, it's crucial to understand that owning the property within a town does not automatically grant the owner governmental authority. Public services, law enforcement, and local governance often remain under municipal or county jurisdiction, depending on the town's legal classification. Residents living in a privately-owned town still retain their rights as citizens and are subject to state and federal laws, as well as any applicable local ordinances.

Examples of Privately Owned Towns

The concept of a privately-owned town, sometimes referred to as a "company town" in historical contexts or simply a "private town," has precedents. A notable contemporary example is the town of Campo in California, which was placed on the market in 2021 for a whopping $3.5 million. Such listings, while rare, demonstrate that the opportunity to acquire an entire community can arise. These opportunities often involve towns that have seen their populations dwindle, or where a single entity already held a majority of the land and structures.

Considerations for Owning a Town

Acquiring an entire town involves complexities far beyond a standard real estate transaction. Prospective owners must consider:

  • Vast Financial Investment: The cost can range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the town's size, condition, and assets.
  • Ongoing Maintenance and Utilities: Responsibility for maintaining private roads, water systems, sewage, and other infrastructure can be significant.
  • Legal and Regulatory Frameworks: Navigating zoning laws, building codes, and state/county regulations is essential.
  • Community Management: If residents live there, managing landlord-tenant relationships, local services, and community needs can be a full-time undertaking, requiring a deep understanding of local laws and community dynamics.
  • Economic Viability: Many towns available for sale are struggling economically, requiring the new owner to invest in revitalization efforts to attract residents or businesses, making it a long-term project rather than a simple purchase.

To clarify the distinction between private property ownership and public governance:

Aspect Private Town Ownership (Typically Includes) Public Governance (Typically Remains With)
Property Land, buildings, privately-owned infrastructure Public parks, public roads (if not privately maintained)
Services Private utilities, some community amenities (if provided) Law enforcement, public schools, emergency services, fire department
Legal Authority Landlord-tenant laws, property use agreements, private contracts Zoning, taxation, criminal law, civic rights, public health regulations
Revenue Generation Rent, business income, private ventures Property taxes, sales taxes, municipal fees, grants

In essence, owning a town means acquiring the vast majority of its real estate assets, giving the owner significant control over the physical environment and the ability to influence its direction, but it does not equate to holding governmental authority over its citizens or public services.