zaro

What are the Negatives of Shale Gas?

Published in Shale Gas Impacts 3 mins read

Shale gas extraction, while a significant energy source, presents several environmental and operational challenges that raise concerns about its long-term impact.

Environmental Impact and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

A primary negative associated with shale gas is its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, which exacerbate climate change. The exploitation of shale gas plays releases a variety of these gases into the atmosphere:

  • Carbon Dioxide (CO2): A well-known greenhouse gas produced during the combustion and processing of fossil fuels.
  • Methane (CH4): A potent greenhouse gas, far more effective at trapping heat than CO2 over a shorter timescale. Methane emissions occur throughout the shale gas lifecycle, from drilling to processing.
  • Other Greenhouse Gases: Various other gases may also be emitted during the extraction process.

A particular concern is 'fugitive' emissions, which are composed primarily of methane (CH4). These emissions refer to unintentional releases that flow to the surface, particularly after the hydraulic fracturing (fracking) process. Such fugitive methane can significantly affect the atmosphere, contributing to its warming potential.

Other Key Concerns Associated with Shale Gas Extraction

Beyond direct greenhouse gas emissions, several other significant negatives are linked to shale gas extraction:

  • Water Contamination: The hydraulic fracturing process involves injecting large volumes of water, sand, and chemicals into the ground at high pressure. There are concerns about:
    • Groundwater contamination from fracking fluids or produced water (water that flows back to the surface after fracking) due to leaks from well casings or faulty wells.
    • Surface water contamination from spills or inadequate treatment of wastewater.
      The complex chemical mixtures used in fracking fluids can contain toxic substances that pose risks to human health and ecosystems if released into water sources. For more information, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has conducted studies on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources.
  • High Water Usage: Hydraulic fracturing requires substantial amounts of water, often millions of gallons per well. This can put a strain on local water resources, especially in arid regions, potentially impacting agricultural, municipal, and ecological needs.
  • Induced Seismicity (Earthquakes): The injection of wastewater from fracking and conventional oil and gas operations into deep disposal wells has been linked to an increase in the frequency and magnitude of earthquakes in certain regions. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides detailed research on induced seismicity.
  • Local Environmental and Community Disruption:
    • Noise and Air Pollution: Drilling operations, truck traffic, and gas processing facilities generate significant noise and air pollution, impacting local air quality and resident well-being.
    • Land Use Impact: Development of well pads, access roads, and infrastructure can lead to habitat fragmentation, deforestation, and general landscape alteration.
    • Traffic Congestion: Increased heavy truck traffic for transporting water, equipment, and materials can damage roads and create safety hazards for local communities.

Here's a summary of the key negatives:

Category Specific Negatives
Atmospheric Impact Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions, Methane (CH4) emissions (including fugitive), other GHGs
Water Resources Groundwater and surface water contamination, high water consumption
Geological Stability Induced seismicity (earthquakes)
Local Environment/Health Noise pollution, air pollution, land degradation, increased traffic

Understanding these negatives is crucial for assessing the overall sustainability and impact of shale gas as an energy source.