zaro

Which Movie is Better, Alive or Society of the Snow?

Published in Survival Drama Film Comparison 3 mins read

When comparing Alive and Society of the Snow, Society of the Snow is generally considered the superior film, particularly for its authentic and dignified portrayal of the harrowing Andes plane crash survival story.

A Deeper Dive into Authenticity

Society of the Snow, released in 2023, has garnered significant acclaim for its commitment to historical accuracy and its profound respect for the survivors and victims of the 1972 Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 disaster. Unlike its predecessor, Alive (1993), which took a more Hollywoodized approach, Society of the Snow meticulously recreates the events with remarkable detail and sensitivity.

Portrayal of Trauma and Suffering

One of the most significant distinctions lies in how each film addresses the immense physical and psychological trauma endured by the survivors. Society of the Snow portrays the trauma and suffering in a profoundly tangible way, making the experiences of the individuals feel more genuine and relatable to the audience. This heightened sense of reality allows viewers to grasp the sheer desperation, resilience, and unimaginable choices faced by those stranded in the unforgiving Andes. The focus shifts from mere survival to the human cost and the dignity maintained amidst extreme duress.

Hollywood vs. Reality: A Comparative Look

While both films tell the same incredible true story, their directorial visions and narrative focuses differ significantly.

  • Alive (1993): Directed by Frank Marshall, Alive is a powerful film in its own right, showcasing the physical challenges and the moral dilemmas of survival. However, it is often criticized for a more polished, cinematic presentation that, while compelling, can sometimes feel less grounded in the raw, brutal reality of the events. It often simplified complex emotional landscapes for broader audience appeal.
  • Society of the Snow (2023): Directed by J.A. Bayona, this film goes to great lengths to immerse the audience directly into the survivors' experience. It prioritizes the emotional depth, the camaraderie, and the individual journeys of grief, hope, and despair. The movie often uses a more intimate lens, focusing on the internal struggles and the shared humanity that allowed the group to endure.

Key Differences at a Glance

Feature Alive (1993) Society of the Snow (2023)
Director Frank Marshall J.A. Bayona
Primary Focus Survival, physical challenges, action Authenticity, psychological impact, human dignity, emotional depth
Portrayal of Trauma Evident, but often from a more distanced perspective Tangible, raw, and deeply relatable
Narrative Style More Hollywoodized, action-oriented Meticulous, respectful, immersive, character-driven
Authenticity Good, but takes some creative liberties Highly prioritized, based on survivors' accounts and research

Why 'Society of the Snow' Resonates

Society of the Snow tells a more authentic and dignified story of the Andes plane crash survivors. It delves deeper into the nuances of their ordeal, from the initial shock and despair to the agonizing decisions regarding cannibalism, the profound bonds formed, and the ultimate triumph of the human spirit. The film's commitment to portraying the events through the lens of the actual people involved, often drawing directly from their testimonies, gives it an unparalleled emotional weight and historical accuracy. This approach makes their experiences feel not just genuine, but deeply impactful and relatable on a human level.

Ultimately, while Alive remains a notable film, Society of the Snow offers a more respectful, accurate, and emotionally resonant depiction of an extraordinary true story, making it the preferred choice for those seeking a deeper understanding of the Andes tragedy.